Oh the Irony: Bomb-sniffing dogs on Vancouver transit worry Muslim leader

Over the years, Islamic jihadist terrorists claiming to act in the name of Islam have targeted mass transit systems around the world.

This occurred in 1995 in the Paris Metro rail system when the Algerian Armed Islamic Group (GIA) detonated a series of bombs which killed 8 innocent victims and wounded 122:

Then, on 6 February 2004, Chechen Jihadist terrorists set off an Islamikaze attack in the Moscow Metro rail system which killed 41 innocent victims:

On 11 March 2004, Islamic jihadist terrorists thought to be affiliated with, or inspired by, Al Qaeda set off a series of bombs in the Madrid rail system, killing 191 and wounding over 1,800 innocent victims:

On 7 July 2005, Islamic jihadist terrorists affiliated with, or inspired by, Al Qaeda, bombed transit targets in London, killing 56 and wounding 700 innocent victims.

No doubt because of this history, security authorities in Vancouver, British Columbia in Canada are taking appropriate measures to guard against such an attack, especially during the upcoming Olympic Games to be held there.

The transit police in Vancouver are planning on using specially-trained bomb-sniffing dogs to detect explosive devices in the Vancouver transit system. Dogs are extremely effective at this type of duty because they have a keen sense of smell and seem never to tire or suffer from lapses which severely effect their job performance. Dogs have successfully detected explosive devices in security situations for decades around the world.

So what does a local Muslim leader in Vancouver, Shawket Hassan,  have to say about all this?

He is “worried” about bomb sniffing dogs because dogs are considered unclean in Islam and Muslims might get touched by such dogs while on their way to pray.

Note that Mr. Hassan has expressed no “worry” about the threat of terrorism to the transit system. He has only express worry about the possibility of getting dog saliva on his person.

It’s difficult not to think of the victims in Paris, Moscow, Madrid and London when you read Mr. Hassan’s comments. Those people were killed by terrorists who openly stated that they believed that they were acting in the name of Islam. Someone might want to remind Mr. Hassan that dogs don’t discriminate according to religion. The bomb-sniffing dogs will be protecting innocent Muslims who ride the Vancouver transit system as well as everyone else.

Mr. Hassan should be thanking Allah that such animals exist on earth to protect us all from evil.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/12/10/bc-bomb-dogs-vancouver-transit-muslims.html?

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Lydia  On 1 DecpmFri, 11 Dec 2009 14:28:32 +00002009-12-11T14:28:32+00:0002 2009 at 14:28

    If Mr. Hassan does not like the way Vancouver runs its public transit system, he can 1) not use it and encourage other Muslims not to use it or 2) return to his native land, where I am the public transit systems are managed more to his liking. It is his obligation to accommodate us, in our efforts to keep ourselves safe from terrorists; it is not our obligation to accommodate him.

    Like

  • terrortrends  On 1 DecpmFri, 11 Dec 2009 14:42:39 +00002009-12-11T14:42:39+00:0002 2009 at 14:42

    That is 100% correct. Note that when Westerners travel to Islamic countries, we are expected to abide by their rules and customs. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, Christians and Jews are forbidden from openly worshipping or even bringing a Holy Bible into the country. In just about all Islamic countries, Western women are expected to cover their hair in some way. But when Muslims come to the West, do they conform to our customs? Absolutely not. On the contrary, they use every means at their disposal to make us play by their rules in the West as well.

    Like

  • Don  On 1 DecpmFri, 11 Dec 2009 15:51:37 +00002009-12-11T15:51:37+00:0003 2009 at 15:51

    My dog is cleaner than this yahoo ever will be.

    Like

  • terrortrends  On 1 DecpmFri, 11 Dec 2009 22:06:00 +00002009-12-11T22:06:00+00:0010 2009 at 22:06

    It’s actually a medical scientific fact that human saliva has far many more harmful germs than canine saliva.

    But that’s not the point. The point is, other faiths understand that practical considerations, especially those involving public safety, often require that they adjust their dogma to reality. But guys like this care more about dog slobber maybe getting on their trousers than they do about preventing innocent people from getting slaughtered.

    Like

  • joe  On 1 DecpmWed, 23 Dec 2009 15:12:37 +00002009-12-23T15:12:37+00:0003 2009 at 15:12

    Fine.

    THEN USE PIGS.

    Like

  • elijahlohrtudgmao.beeplog.com  On 1 AugamMon, 11 Aug 2014 01:57:08 +00002014-08-11T01:57:08+00:0001 2009 at 01:57

    Right here is the perfect site for anyone who wishes
    to understand this topic. You realize a whole lot
    its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually will need
    to…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a subject
    that has been discussed for ages. Wonderful stuff, just wonderful!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,831 other followers

%d bloggers like this: